Σύνδεσμος Ακαδημαϊκών Εκδοτών Ανοικτής Πρόσβασης: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Από τη Βικιπαίδεια, την ελεύθερη εγκυκλοπαίδεια
Περιήγηση ιστορικού διαδραστικά
← Προηγούμενη διαφοράΕπόμενη διαφορά →
Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
ΟπτικήΚώδικας wiki
μ WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #61. Punctuation goes before References. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (11876)
Γραμμή 108: Γραμμή 108:
== Response to the ''Science'' sting ==
== Response to the ''Science'' sting ==
<!-- this is copied from [[Who's Afraid of Peer Review?#Responses from the open access academic publishing industry]] -->
<!-- this is copied from [[Who's Afraid of Peer Review?#Responses from the open access academic publishing industry]] -->
As a response to the ''[[Who's Afraid of Peer Review?]]'' investigation, OASPA formed a committee to investigate the circumstances that led to the acceptance of the fake paper by 3 of its members.<ref name="redhead">{{cite web |last=Redhead |first=Claire |title=OASPA's response to the recent article in Science entitled "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?" |url=http://oaspa.org/response-to-the-recent-article-in-science/ |publisher=Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association |accessdate=21 October 2013}}</ref> On 11 November 2013, OASPA terminated the membership of two publishers ([[Dove Medical Press]] and Hikari Ltd.) who accepted the fake paper. Sage Press, which also accepted a fake paper, was put "under review" for 6 months.<ref name="oaspa"/> Sage announced in a statement that it was reviewing the journal that accepted the fake paper, but that it would not shut it down.<ref name="Statement by SAGE on the Journal of International Medical Research">{{cite web |last=Gamboa |first=Camille |title=Statement by SAGE on the Journal of International Medical Research |url=http://www.sagepub.com/press/2013/october/SAGE_statementSAGEJIMR.sp |publisher=Sage |accessdate=22 November 2013}}</ref> Sage's membership was reinstated at the end of the review period following changes to the journal's editorial processes <ref>{{cite news|last=Shaffi|first=Sarah|url=http://www.thebookseller.com/news/oaspa-reinstates-sage-membership.html|title=OASPA reinstates Sage membership|work=[[The Bookseller]]|date=29 April 2014|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref>. Dove Medical Press were also reinstated in September 2015 after making a number of improvements to their editorial processes <ref>{{cite news|last=Redhead|first=Claire|url=http://oaspa.org/dove-medical-press-reinstated-as-oaspa-members/|title=Dove Medical Press reinstated as OASPA Members|work=[[Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association]]|date=23 September 2015|accessdate=1 February 2016}}</ref>.
As a response to the ''[[Who's Afraid of Peer Review?]]'' investigation, OASPA formed a committee to investigate the circumstances that led to the acceptance of the fake paper by 3 of its members.<ref name="redhead">{{cite web |last=Redhead |first=Claire |title=OASPA's response to the recent article in Science entitled "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?" |url=http://oaspa.org/response-to-the-recent-article-in-science/ |publisher=Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association |accessdate=21 October 2013}}</ref> On 11 November 2013, OASPA terminated the membership of two publishers ([[Dove Medical Press]] and Hikari Ltd.) who accepted the fake paper. Sage Press, which also accepted a fake paper, was put "under review" for 6 months.<ref name="oaspa"/> Sage announced in a statement that it was reviewing the journal that accepted the fake paper, but that it would not shut it down.<ref name="Statement by SAGE on the Journal of International Medical Research">{{cite web |last=Gamboa |first=Camille |title=Statement by SAGE on the Journal of International Medical Research |url=http://www.sagepub.com/press/2013/october/SAGE_statementSAGEJIMR.sp |publisher=Sage |accessdate=22 November 2013}}</ref> Sage's membership was reinstated at the end of the review period following changes to the journal's editorial processes.<ref>{{cite news|last=Shaffi|first=Sarah|url=http://www.thebookseller.com/news/oaspa-reinstates-sage-membership.html|title=OASPA reinstates Sage membership|work=[[The Bookseller]]|date=29 April 2014|accessdate=2 June 2014}}</ref> Dove Medical Press were also reinstated in September 2015 after making a number of improvements to their editorial processes.<ref>{{cite news|last=Redhead|first=Claire|url=http://oaspa.org/dove-medical-press-reinstated-as-oaspa-members/|title=Dove Medical Press reinstated as OASPA Members|work=Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association|date=23 September 2015|accessdate=1 February 2016}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Γραμμή 117: Γραμμή 117:
*[[International Publishers Association]]
*[[International Publishers Association]]
*[[:Category:Open access publishers]]
*[[:Category:Open access publishers]]
*[[Periodical Publishers Association]]
*[[Periodical Publishers Association]]
*[[Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition]]
*[[Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition]]
*[[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]
*[[Society for Scholarly Publishing]]
Γραμμή 125: Γραμμή 125:


== External links ==
== External links ==
* {{Official|http://www.oaspa.org/}}
* {{Official website|http://www.oaspa.org/}}
* [http://river-valley.zeeba.tv/category/conferences/publishing/coasp/ Video recordings from the Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing]
* [http://river-valley.zeeba.tv/category/conferences/publishing/coasp/ Video recordings from the Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing]

*{{Citizendium}}
*{{Citizendium}}

[[Category:Open access (publishing)]]
[[Category:Open access (publishing)]]
[[Category:Trade associations]]
[[Category:Trade associations]]

Έκδοση από την 06:34, 2 Φεβρουαρίου 2016

Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
ΣυντομογραφίαOASPA
Ίδρυση14 October 2008
ΤύποςInternational professional association
ΈδραOnline, Ολλανδία
ΜέληScholarly open access publishers
Επίσημες γλώσσεςEnglish
PresidentCaroline Sutton
Ιστότοποςoaspa.org
δεδομένα (π • σ • ε )

The Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) is an industry association which aims to promote open access publishing (particularly open access journals) and to establish best practices in the field. It brings together the major open access publishers on the one hand and independent—often society-based or university-based—publishers on the other, along with some hybrid open access publishers. While having started out with a focus on open access journals exclusively, it is now expanding its activities to include matters pertaining to the open access books as well.[1]

Mission

The mission of OASPA is to support and represent the interests of open access publishers globally in all scientific, technical, and scholarly disciplines, and to advocate for Open Access journals in general.[2] To this end, it provides a forum for professional exchange on matters of open access publishing in scholarly contexts, it engages in standardization efforts and outreach, identifies and promotes best practices for scholarly communications by open access, and supports the continuous development of viable business and publishing models.

History

With the growth of the open access movement, the interactions between different open access publishers intensified, as they met each other at a multitude of trade or scientific conferences, workshops or similar events. Yet open access publishing and its peculiarities with respect to traditional publishing or scholarly communication were rarely in the focus of such gatherings, which brought about the need for a dedicated forum. With the intention to provide that, OASPA was launched on October 14, 2008 at an "Open Access Day" celebration in London hosted by the Wellcome Trust.[3][4][5] The following organizations are founding members:[6]

Activities

OASPA organizes an annual Conference on Open Access Scholarly Publishing.[7] The conference covers the whole spectrum of open access publishing, including business models, publishing platforms, peer review modes, and distribution channels.

OASPA encourages publishers to use Creative Commons licenses, particularly the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY),[8] which is in line with most definitions of "open", e.g. the Open Definition by the Open Knowledge Foundation.[9] The organization also engages beyond Open Access journals, e.g. for free access to scholarly works that have been awarded Nobel Prizes.[10]

Members

There are four types of OASPA members:[11]

  • Open access professional publishing organizations
  • Open access scientist/scholar publishers
  • Other organizations
  • Associate (non-voting) members

In addition to the founding members above, the following organizations are current members (as of January 2015):[12]

Criticism

Criticism has focused on OASPA's self-declared role as the "stamp of quality for open access publishing", because it is apparently at odds with OASPA's application of its own criteria for membership. Another voiced concern is the fact that OASPA has been founded by BioMed Central and other open access publishers, which would cause a conflict of interest in their "seal of approval".[13][14] OASPA has also been criticized for promoting gold open access in a way that may be at the expense of green open access.[15] At least two member organizations, MDPI and Frontiers Media, are included on Jeffrey Beall's list of predatory open access publishing companies;[16] conversely, at least one member, Hindawi, was once called predatory by Beall, but has since been removed from his list.[17]

Response to the Science sting

As a response to the Who's Afraid of Peer Review? investigation, OASPA formed a committee to investigate the circumstances that led to the acceptance of the fake paper by 3 of its members.[18] On 11 November 2013, OASPA terminated the membership of two publishers (Dove Medical Press and Hikari Ltd.) who accepted the fake paper. Sage Press, which also accepted a fake paper, was put "under review" for 6 months.[1] Sage announced in a statement that it was reviewing the journal that accepted the fake paper, but that it would not shut it down.[19] Sage's membership was reinstated at the end of the review period following changes to the journal's editorial processes.[20] Dove Medical Press were also reinstated in September 2015 after making a number of improvements to their editorial processes.[21]

See also

References

  1. ↑ 1,0 1,1 This article incorporates material from the OASPA website, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
  2. ↑ OASPA Mission, accessed Nov 28, 2010
  3. ↑ OASPA History, accessed Nov 28, 2010
  4. ↑ New Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) Launched, a report by SPARC Europe, accessed Nov 28, 2010
  5. ↑ Launch of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA). Scholarly Communications Report 12(10):5 (2008).
  6. ↑ «Founding Members». Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Ανακτήθηκε στις 6 Ιανουαρίου 2015. 
  7. ↑ COASP homepage, accessed Feb 13, 2011
  8. ↑ OASPA’s response to the OSTP's request for public comment on Public Access Policies for Science and Technology Funding Agencies Across the Federal Government, accessed February 13, 2011.
  9. ↑ Open Definition, accessed February 13, 2011
  10. ↑ Open Access to Nobel Prize awarded work – a pilot project, accessed February 13, 2011
  11. ↑ Further information on membership criteria is available at http://www.oaspa.org/membership_criteria.html.
  12. ↑ «Members». Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Ανακτήθηκε στις 6 Ιανουαρίου 2015. 
  13. ↑ According to Open Access linked to Alabama shooting and The OA Interviews: Sciyo's Aleksandar Lazinica by journalist Richard Poynder, several suspicious OA publishers — Dove Medical Press, Sciyo and InTech — have at some point been OASPA members. According to OASPA's list of members, none of these three are a member as of February 2011.
  14. ↑ OASPA: act now or lose credibility forever by librarian Dorothea Salo, accessed February 13, 2011.
  15. ↑ According to Critique of Criteria for "Full Membership" in OASPA ("Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association") by scientist and Green OA advocate Stevan Harnad, OASPA accepted Oxford University Press as a member because it publishes some Gold OA journals, while ignoring that most OUP journals are not Gold OA, and even prohibit Green OA for a year. Accessed February 13, 2011.
  16. ↑ Jeffrey Beall (18 February 2014), Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers, Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing
  17. ↑ Butler, Declan (2013). «Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing». Nature 495 (7442): 433–435. doi:10.1038/495433a. PMID 23538810. 
  18. ↑ Redhead, Claire. «OASPA's response to the recent article in Science entitled "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?"». Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Ανακτήθηκε στις 21 Οκτωβρίου 2013. 
  19. ↑ Gamboa, Camille. «Statement by SAGE on the Journal of International Medical Research». Sage. Ανακτήθηκε στις 22 Νοεμβρίου 2013. 
  20. ↑ Shaffi, Sarah (29 April 2014). «OASPA reinstates Sage membership». The Bookseller. http://www.thebookseller.com/news/oaspa-reinstates-sage-membership.html. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2 June 2014. 
  21. ↑ Redhead, Claire (23 September 2015). «Dove Medical Press reinstated as OASPA Members». Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. http://oaspa.org/dove-medical-press-reinstated-as-oaspa-members/. Ανακτήθηκε στις 1 February 2016. 

External links

Ανακτήθηκε από "https://el.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Σύνδεσμος_Ακαδημαϊκών_Εκδοτών_Ανοικτής_Πρόσβασης&oldid=5964715"