Βικιπαίδεια:Τι σημαίνει «Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες»: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Από τη Βικιπαίδεια, την ελεύθερη εγκυκλοπαίδεια
Περιήγηση ιστορικού διαδραστικά
← Προηγούμενη διαφοράΕπόμενη διαφορά →
Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
ΟπτικήΚώδικας wiki
Χωρίς σύνοψη επεξεργασίας
Χωρίς σύνοψη επεξεργασίας
Γραμμή 18: Γραμμή 18:
*Following the rules is less important than using good judgment and being thoughtful and considerate, always bearing in mind that good judgment is not displayed only by those who agree with you. (See also [[Wikipedia:Civility]].)
*Following the rules is less important than using good judgment and being thoughtful and considerate, always bearing in mind that good judgment is not displayed only by those who agree with you. (See also [[Wikipedia:Civility]].)


==Τι δε σημαίνει το "Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες"==
==What "Ignore all rules" does not mean==
[[Image:IAR doesn't mean this.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Sometimes you need to draw the limit]]
[[Image:IAR doesn't mean this.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Sometimes you need to draw the limit]]
{{quote|''Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.''|[[George Pólya]]<ref> {{ Cite book | last= Pólya | first= George | title=[[ How to Solve It]] |year= 1945 |publisher= Princeton Science Library | isbn= 0-691-11966-X | pages= 148 }}</ref>}}
{{απόσπασμα|''Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.''|[[George Pólya]]<ref> {{ Cite book | last= Pólya | first= George | title=[[ How to Solve It]] |year= 1945 |publisher= Princeton Science Library | isbn= 0-691-11966-X | pages= 148 }}</ref>}}


{{απόσπασμα|''Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες — και αυτού περιλαμβανομένου.''}}
{{quote|''Ignore all rules — including this one.''}}


Despite its name, "[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|Ignore all rules]]" does not sabotage the other rules. Its purpose is to keep them from sabotaging what we're doing here: building a free encyclopedia. Rules have ''zero'' importance compared with that goal. If they aid that goal, good. If they interfere with it, they are instantly negated.
Despite its name, "[[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules|Ignore all rules]]" does not sabotage the other rules. Its purpose is to keep them from sabotaging what we're doing here: building a free encyclopedia. Rules have ''zero'' importance compared with that goal. If they aid that goal, good. If they interfere with it, they are instantly negated.
Γραμμή 37: Γραμμή 37:




== Χρησιμοποιείστε την κοινή λογική ==
== Use common sense ==
{{Redirect6|WP:COMMON|common outcomes of deletion discussions|WP:OUTCOMES|use of common names in article titles|WP:COMMONNAME}}
{{Redirect6|WP:COMMON|common outcomes of deletion discussions|WP:OUTCOMES|use of common names in article titles|WP:COMMONNAME}}


Γραμμή 47: Γραμμή 47:


{{anchor|No common sense}}
{{anchor|No common sense}}
=== There is no common sense ===
=== Δεν υπάρχει κοινή λογική ===
{{quote|''Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.''|[[René Descartes]]<ref> {{ Cite book | last=Descartes | first=René | title=[[Discourse on the Method|Le Discours de la Méthode]]| year=1637 | at=Part I, incipit | quote= ''Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu, que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.''}}</ref>}}
{{απόσπασμα|''Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.''|[[René Descartes]]<ref> {{ Cite book | last=Descartes | first=René | title=[[Discourse on the Method|Le Discours de la Méthode]]| year=1637 | at=Part I, incipit | quote= ''Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu, que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.''}}</ref>}}


When advancing a position or justifying an action, base your argument on [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|existing agreements]], [[Meta:Community foundation issues|community foundation issues]] and the ''interests of the encyclopedia'', not your own common sense. Exhorting another editor to "just use common sense" is likely to be taken as insulting, for good reasons. If in a particular case you feel that literally following a rule harms the encyclopedia, or that doing something which the rules technically allow degrades it, then instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, cite [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] and explain why doing so will improve Wikipedia in that instance.
When advancing a position or justifying an action, base your argument on [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|existing agreements]], [[Meta:Community foundation issues|community foundation issues]] and the ''interests of the encyclopedia'', not your own common sense. Exhorting another editor to "just use common sense" is likely to be taken as insulting, for good reasons. If in a particular case you feel that literally following a rule harms the encyclopedia, or that doing something which the rules technically allow degrades it, then instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, cite [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]] and explain why doing so will improve Wikipedia in that instance.
Γραμμή 54: Γραμμή 54:
Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. While it's quite acceptable to explain your own actions by saying, "it seemed like [[WP:COMMON|common sense]] to me," you should be careful not to imply that other editors are ''lacking'' in common sense, which may be seen as [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivil]]. [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]s come from diverse ethnic, religious, political, cultural and ideological backgrounds and have vastly different perceptions regarding everything from science to shoe shopping. Other editors are likely to ascribe very different meanings and values to words and concepts than you, so try to state your arguments as fully as possible. Citing concrete [[WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] is likely to be more effective than simply citing "common sense" and leaving it at that.
Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. While it's quite acceptable to explain your own actions by saying, "it seemed like [[WP:COMMON|common sense]] to me," you should be careful not to imply that other editors are ''lacking'' in common sense, which may be seen as [[Wikipedia:Civility|uncivil]]. [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]s come from diverse ethnic, religious, political, cultural and ideological backgrounds and have vastly different perceptions regarding everything from science to shoe shopping. Other editors are likely to ascribe very different meanings and values to words and concepts than you, so try to state your arguments as fully as possible. Citing concrete [[WP:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] is likely to be more effective than simply citing "common sense" and leaving it at that.


== See also ==
== Δείτε επίσης ==
* [[Wikipedia:Be bold]]
* [[Wikipedia:Be bold]]
* [[Wikipedia:Understanding IAR]]
* [[Wikipedia:Understanding IAR]]
Γραμμή 64: Γραμμή 64:
* [[Spirit of the law]]
* [[Spirit of the law]]


== References ==
== Παραπομπές ==
{{παραπομπές}}
{{reflist}}


{{en:Wikipedia principles}}
{{en:Wikipedia principles}}
{{en:Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}
{{en:Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}


[[Category:Wikipedia essays explaining processes|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Κατηγορία:Wikipedia essays explaining processes|{{PAGENAME}}]]


[[es:Wikipedia:Qué significa "Ignora las normas"]]
[[es:Wikipedia:Qué significa "Ignora las normas"]]

Έκδοση από την 10:13, 11 Φεβρουαρίου 2012

Πρότυπο:Essay

Συντόμευση:

Εάν ένας κανόνας σε εμποδίζει απ'το να βελτιώνεις ή να διατηρείς τη Βικιπαίδεια, αγνόησέ τον.

Τι σημαίνει "Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες"

Σπάστε τους κανόνες με όλα τα μέσα, αλλά κάντε το όμορφα, προσεκτικά και καλά. Αυτός είναι ένας από τους σκοπούς για τον οποίο υπάρχουν.

— Robert Bringhurst[1]

Ο κώδικας είναι περισσότερο αυτό που αποκαλείς "οδηγίες" παρά οι πραγματικοί κανόνες.

— Captain Barbossa[2]

You do not need to read any rules before contributing to Wikipedia. If you do what seems sensible, it will usually be right, and if it's not right, don't worry. Even the worst mistakes are easy to correct: older versions of a page remain in the revision history and can be restored. If we disagree with your changes, we'll talk about it thoughtfully and politely, and we'll figure out what to do. So don't worry. Be bold, and enjoy helping to build this free encyclopedia.

  • You are not required to learn the rules before contributing. Yes, we already said that, but it is worth repeating.
  • Don't follow written instructions mindlessly, but rather, consider how the encyclopedia is improved or damaged by each edit. (See also Use common sense, below.)
  • Rules derive their power to compel not from being written down on a page labeled "guideline" or "policy", but from being a reflection of the shared opinions and practices of many editors. (See also Wikipedia:Consensus.)
  • Most rules are ultimately descriptive, not prescriptive; they describe existing current practice. They sometimes lag behind the practices they describe. (See also Wikipedia:Product, process, policy.)
  • WikiLawyering doesn't work. Loopholes and technicalities do not exist on the Wiki. Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy; nor moot court, nor nomic, nor Mao.
  • The spirit of the rule trumps the letter of the rule. The common purpose of building a free encyclopedia trumps both. If this common purpose is better served by ignoring the letter of a particular rule, then that rule should be ignored. (See also Wikipedia:The rules are principles.)
  • Following the rules is less important than using good judgment and being thoughtful and considerate, always bearing in mind that good judgment is not displayed only by those who agree with you. (See also Wikipedia:Civility.)

Τι δε σημαίνει το "Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες"

Sometimes you need to draw the limit

Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.

— George Pólya[3]

Αγνοήστε όλους τους κανόνες — και αυτού περιλαμβανομένου.

Despite its name, "Ignore all rules" does not sabotage the other rules. Its purpose is to keep them from sabotaging what we're doing here: building a free encyclopedia. Rules have zero importance compared with that goal. If they aid that goal, good. If they interfere with it, they are instantly negated.

  • "Ignore all rules" does not mean that every action is justifiable. It is neither a trump card nor a carte blanche. A rule-ignorer must justify how their actions improve the encyclopedia if challenged. Actually, everyone should be able to do that at all times. In cases of conflict, what counts as an improvement is decided by consensus.
  • "Ignore all rules" does not stop you from pointing out a rule to someone who has broken it, but do consider that their judgment may have been correct, and that they almost certainly thought it was. (See also Wikipedia:Assume good faith.)
  • "Ignore all rules" is not in itself a valid answer if someone asks you why you broke a rule. Most of the rules are derived from a lot of thoughtful experience and exist for pretty good reasons; they should therefore only be broken for good reasons.
  • "Ignore all rules" is not an exemption from accountability. You're still responsible for reasonably foreseeable effects of your actions on the encyclopedia and on other editors.
  • "Ignore all rules" is not an invitation to use Wikipedia for purposes contrary to that of building a free encyclopedia. (See also Wikipedia:About and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.)
  • "Ignore all rules" does not mean there is necessarily an exception to every rule. A typical copyright violation, for instance, does not make for a better free encyclopedia.
  • "Ignore all rules" does not mean that you can violate Wikipedia:Office actions without being blocked for disruption.


Χρησιμοποιείστε την κοινή λογική

Πρότυπο:Redirect6

Συντομεύσεις:

Wikipedia has many rules. Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution "violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Similarly, just because something is not forbidden in a written document, or is even explicitly permitted, doesn't mean it's a good idea in the given situation. The principle of the rules is more important than the letter. Editors must use their best judgment.

Why isn't "use common sense" an official policy? It doesn't need to be; as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy.

Δεν υπάρχει κοινή λογική

Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.

— René Descartes[4]

When advancing a position or justifying an action, base your argument on existing agreements, community foundation issues and the interests of the encyclopedia, not your own common sense. Exhorting another editor to "just use common sense" is likely to be taken as insulting, for good reasons. If in a particular case you feel that literally following a rule harms the encyclopedia, or that doing something which the rules technically allow degrades it, then instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, cite Wikipedia:Ignore all rules and explain why doing so will improve Wikipedia in that instance.

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. While it's quite acceptable to explain your own actions by saying, "it seemed like common sense to me," you should be careful not to imply that other editors are lacking in common sense, which may be seen as uncivil. Wikipedians come from diverse ethnic, religious, political, cultural and ideological backgrounds and have vastly different perceptions regarding everything from science to shoe shopping. Other editors are likely to ascribe very different meanings and values to words and concepts than you, so try to state your arguments as fully as possible. Citing concrete policies and guidelines is likely to be more effective than simply citing "common sense" and leaving it at that.

Δείτε επίσης

Παραπομπές

  1. ↑ Bringhurst, Robert (2005). The Elements of Typographic Style (3.1 έκδοση). Hartley & Marks. σελ. 10. ISBN 0-88179-206-3. 
  2. ↑ Φανταστικός χαρακτήρας, στην ταινία του 2003Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
  3. ↑ Pólya, George (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton Science Library. σελ. 148. ISBN 0-691-11966-X. 
  4. ↑ Descartes, René (1637). Le Discours de la Méthode. Part I, incipit. Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu, que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont. 

{{en:Wikipedia principles}} {{en:Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}

Ανακτήθηκε από "https://el.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Βικιπαίδεια:Τι_σημαίνει_«Αγνοήστε_όλους_τους_κανόνες»&oldid=3137281"